In case this helps anyone else, I had a few scenarios where I really want things to happen in a random order (a good QA strategy, rather than always being the same).
There doesn’t seem to be a built-in way, so here’s what I came up with. Just pass a comma delimited list and you’ll get it returned in a different order.
scriptname : orderListByRandom
/// should be a comma separated list .
set vListCount to the number of items in vList
set rOrderList to any item of vList & "," // need to start the new random Order list so we can validate against it.
repeat while the number of items in rOrderList is less than vListCount
set newItem to any item of vList
set uniqueItem to "" // reset it (always a good idea when we're looping)
repeat with each item in rOrderList
if newItem = it
set uniqueItem to false
exit repeat // we don't need further evaluation since it matched.
set uniqueitem to true
if uniqueItem = true
put newItem & "," after rOrderList
//put "Items in random list: " && the number of items in rOrderList //debug
if the last character in rOrderList is "," // trim it.
delete the last character in rOrderList
//put rOrderList // debug
use this to see that it does order a list at random:
put (1,2,3,4,5) into mylist
repeat 5 times
Your output will list 5 different orders of the items (numbers) passed. Hope this helps someone.
Hi, I hate to rain on your parade after you’ve obviously put a lot of good effort into developing this code. There is an easier way, although it’s not very obvious, and is clearly something that we should document somewhere.
The easy solution is to use the sort command and random numbers:
put (1,2,3,4,5) into myList
sort myList by random(1000)
I’ve thought about adding a shuffle or randomize function to the language to make this more explicit and easier to find, but for now just use sort. And if there’s something you need to do that isn’t obvious, feel free to ask here!
I figured one of you might point out a built-in way to do it. It wasn’t too much effort as I have done something similar (comparing 2 lists) in the past. I was more worried you might point out a fatal flaw (like passing an extra comma - which occurred to me, but I haven’t tried it as I plan on controlling the lists).
I did search the Sensetalk browser for Sort, and it came up with Zero. I also did find the documentation that mentioned sorting, but yes, it’s light.
Of course, anytime a post like this goes up, it helps someone if they search (I did). So this is a form of documentation.
I’d also point out that you started out defining an actual list object [(1,2,3,4,5)], but then you ended up treating it as a string. There shouldn’t be any need to manage the commas, because they’re not part of the actual list – they’re just the visual delimiters of the items. I’d forgotten Doug’s shortcut and was going to offer this alternative:
put a..z as list into alphas -- Create a range of letters
put 1..5 as list into nums -- Create a range of numbers
repeat 20 times // generate a list of random 5 character strings
insert (any item of alphas for each item of nums) joined by empty after Names
repeat the number of items in Names
put random(the number of items in Names) into itemNo
insert item itemNo of Names after randomNames
delete item itemNo of Names